Cooperation: strategy for sustainability of resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v14i2.738Keywords:
cooperation, social choice. corporate culture, groups, social capitalAbstract
This article seeks to answer the question: ¿what should be the principle of structuring an organization if there is no basis underlying the foundation of the structure dedicated to the sustainability of resources? The proposed idea is not only to define the corporate structure, but also seek mutual benefits collectively, to facilitate sustainability and optimization of resources of the organization, from coherent, relevant, viable and rigorous strategies. To this end the postulates of critics Robert Axelrod, Michael Taylor, Thomas Schelling, Roy Behr, Elinor Ostrom and Garret Hardin, which formed the basis for the theoretical formulation of evolution in cooperation systems related resources are presented. Presents and analyzes the principles of: definition of limits, rules and sanctions for resource appropriators, collective choice arrangements, and supervision. Product of the approaches set, it follows that to obtain significant benefits, it is necessary to develop models of collective self-management and self-management.
References
Ashworth, T. (1980). Trench Warfare. (1914-1918): The Live and Let Live System, New York: Holmes & Meier.
Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective Choice in the Prisone´s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3-25.
Axelrod, R. (1980b). More Effective Choice in the Prisone´s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379-403.
Axelrod, R. (1981). The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoist. American Political Science Review, 75, 306-318.
Axelrod, R. (1986). La evolución de la Cooperación – El dilema del prisionero y la teoría de juegos. Madrid: Alianza editores.
Behr, R. L. (1981). Nice Guys Finish last–Sometimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 289-300.
Bullock K & Baden, J. (1977). Communes and the Logic of the Commons. En: G. Hardin & J. Baden (eds.), Managing the Commons, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Chase, I. (1980). Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior in Animal. American Naturalist, 115, 827-857
Dawes, R. (1980). Social Dilemma. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downing, L. (1975). The Prisoner`s Dilemma Game as a Problem-Solving Phenomenon: An Outcome Maximizing Interpretation. Simulation and Games 6, 366-391.
Fagen, R. (1980). When Doves Conspire: Evolution of Nondamaging Fighting Tactics in a Nonrandom-Encounter Animal Conflict Model. American Naturalist, 115, 858-869
Fisher, R. A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, W. (1964). Population, Evolution, and Birth Control. San Francisco: Garret Hardin eds.
Haldane, J.B.S. (1955). Population Genetics. New Biology, 19, 34-51
Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior. American Naturalist, 97, 354-356.
Hardin, G. (1968). La Tragedia de los Comunes. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. Traducción de Horacio Bonfil Sánchez. Gaceta Ecológica, num.37, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, México, 1995.
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
Howard, N. (1966). The Mathematics of Meta-Games. General Systems, 11 (5): 187-200.
Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Racionality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior, Cambridge: Mass MIT Press.
Lack, D. (1954). The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lumsden, M. (1973). The Cyprus Conflict as a Prisioner´s Dilemma, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 7-32.
Neher, P.A. (1978). The Pure Theory of the Muggery, American Economic Review, 68, 437-445.
Norman, C. (1984). No Panacea for the Firewood Crisis. Science, 226(4675), 676.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of Programmed Strategies on Cooperation in the Prisoner`s Dilemma and Other Mixed-Motive Games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15; 225-229.
Ostrom, E. (2000). El Gobierno de los Bienes Comunes. La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ostrom, E. Gardne, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, V. (1991). The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Goerning Society. San Francisco: ICS Press.
Ostrom, V.; Feeny, D.; & Picht, H. (1993). Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives, and Choices. San Francisco: ICS Press.
Picardi, A. C. & Seifert, W. (1977). A Tragedy of the commons in the Sahel. Ekistics, 43; 297-304.
Plott, C. & Meyer R. (1975). The Technology of Public Goods, Externalities, and the Exclusion Principle. En: E.S. Mills (ed), Economic, Analysis of Enviroinmental Problems. Ney York: Columbia University Press.
Rapoport, A, (1967). Escape from Paradox. Scientific American 217, 50-56
Rapoport, A. & Chammah, A. (1965). Prisoner´s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Scharpf, F.W. (1985). Ideological Conflict the Public-Private Frontier: Some Exploratory Notes, Berlín: Wissenschftszentrum, Documento de trabajo.
Scharpf, F.W. (1987). A Game-Theoretical Explanation of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe, Journal of Public Policy, 7, 227-258.
Scharpf, F.W. (1988). The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, Public Administration, 66, 239-278.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schelling, T. C. (1973). Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight Saving: A Study of Binary Choices with Externalities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 381-428.
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. En: Thomas Schelling, ed., Micromotives and Macrobehavior, 9-43. New York: Norton.
Shepsle, K. & Weingast, B. (1984). Legislative Politics and Budget Outcomes. En: G. Mills y J. Palmer (eds.), Federal Budget Policy in the 1980´s. Washington: Urban Institute Press, 343-367.
Shubik, M. (1970). Game Theory, behavior, and the Paradox of Prisoner`s Dilemma: Three Solutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 181-194.
Smith M. (1974). The Theory of Games and the Evolution of Animal Conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 209-221.
Smith, M. (1978). The Evolution of Behavior. Scientific American, 239, 176-192.
Snidal, D. (1985). Coordination Versus Prisioner´s Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimens, American Political Science Review, 79, 923-947.
Taylor, M. (1976). Anarchy and Cooperation. New York: Wiley.
Taylor, M. (1987). The possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, J.T. (1977). Ecological Deterioration: Local-Level Rule Making and Enforcement Problems in Niger. En: M.H.Glantz (ed), Desertification: Environmental Degradation in and around Arid Lands. Boulder: Westview Press, 57-79.
Trivers, R. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
Von Neuman, J. & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of Games the Economic Bahavior. Pricenton: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, R. (1985). Contraints on Social Dilemmas: An Institutional Approach, Annal of Operations Reserch, 2, 183-200.
Wilson, W. (1971). Reciprocation and Other Techniques for Inducing Cooperation in the Dilemma Game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 167-195.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2021-03-17 (2)
- 2016-06-21 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Instructions for filling in the Certification of Originality and the Copyright Transfer:
Keep in mind that by pressing the "save and continue" button at the end, you are assuming all the ethical and legal commitments set forth herein. They establish the responsibilities of the legislation on intellectual property rights. For this it is assumed that whoever is carrying out the action of presenting the written work in good faith and represents himself and the other authors of the postulated article.
In this sense, the authors retain all the rights of which they are owners and authorize the free reproduction of the document sent. In the event of being necessary, they will assume, by pressing the "save and continue" button, the legal responsibility derived from the patrimonial rights which are free because of the non-payment by any procedure of the Journal.
Consequently, the author (s) represented by the person who advances the postulation of the article for evaluation and eventual publication,
I (We) declare:
1. I am (we are) the author (s) of the article {here is the name of the article placed automatically}.
2. This is an original work in accordance with the intellectual property law of Colombian copyright.
3. The content of the article of the reference has not been published and that it will not be submitted to any other means of publication in written or electronic support before knowing the decision of the Editorial Committee of Dimensión Empresarial.
4. The signer of this certification guarantees that the commitment acquired here does not infringe any third-party rights.
5. The publication authorization includes its electronic file and its adaptation, if necessary, for its incorporation in the network or in any electronic format or database, as well as attaching the necessary metadata to register the work, trademarks of water or any other security or protection system.
6. The publication authorization includes reproduction on digital media. As well as its distribution and making available through institutional archives through the Internet, distribute copies, and exhibit it in Colombia and outside the country, as well as include the article in national and international indexes.
7. The author assumes all responsibility, including compensation for damages, that could be exercised against the Universidad Autónoma del Caribe by third parties who violated their rights and interests because of the assignment.
For its part, Dimension Empresarial undertakes to respect in any case the rights of the author contained in Article 30 of Law 23 of 1982, or any after it and will make the article available to the users of the Journal so that make a legitimate use of it, as permitted by the applicable legislation, provided that its authorship is cited, commercial benefit is not obtained, and derivative works are not made.
The authors agree to accept the conditions of this intellectual property note, which will be applied to this submission when it is published in this journal.
