Implementation research in the initial training of mathematics teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/encuen.v20i02-Julio-dic..2899Keywords:
Matemáticas, investigación, implementación, argumentación, profesorAbstract
The main objective of the study was to analyze the change in the conceptions that future mathematics teachers (FPM) have regarding the design of tasks that promote argumentation in mathematics classes in an initial training course. The qualitative methodology and guided by the educational design research approach (DBR), was situated in the methodology of the implementation of the research to carry out a questionnaire at the beginning and a mathematical task design activity at the end of the course. The study’s main results show the change in the conceptions of the FPM and the varied proposals of mathematical task designs that involved exploration and argumentation activities. We conclude that the implementation of the research results generated awareness in the participants regarding how the results of research in Mathematics Education contribute to the improvement of the mathematics teaching process.
References
Barreiro, P., Leonian, P., Marino, T., Pochulu, M. y Rodríguez, M. (2017). Perspectivas metodológicas en la enseñanza y en la investigación en educación matemática. Argentina, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bakker, A. y van Eerde, D. (2015). An Introduction to Design-Based Research with an Example From Statistics Education. En A. Bikner-Ahsbahs et al. (eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, Advances in Mathematics Education (pp.429-449), DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
Ball, D., Thames, M. y Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59: 389-407
Braun, T. y Lindeman, U. (2004). Method adaptation, a way yo improve methodical producto development. International design conferente, (pp. 18-21), Dubroynik
Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2012). Análisis temático. En P. M. n H. Cooper, APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological.American Psychological Association, 57-71 https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Cabañas-Sánchez, G. y Cervantes-Barraza, J. A. (2019). Principios que fundamentan el diseño de tareas matemáticas en una planificación didáctica. Revista Uno, 85, 7-12.
Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., Cabañas-Sánchez, G. y Mercado-Porras, K. (2020). El rol del profesor en la construcción de conocimiento matemático a través de la argumentación colectiva. En H. Hernández, J. Juárez, J. Slisko (Eds.). PP. 214-2
Cabañas-Sánchez, G. y Cervantes-Barraza, J. A. (2021). Teacher promoting student mathematical arguments through questions. En Inprasitha, M., Changsri, N., Boonsena (Eds.). Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 233-241. Khon Kaen, Thailand: PME.
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V. y Hiebert, J. (2017). Making Classroom Implementation an Integral Part of Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 342–347.
Century, J. y Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation Research: Finding Common Ground on What, How, Why, Where, and Who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215.
Climent, N., Montes, M.A., Contreras, L.C., Carrillo, J., Liñan, M. M., Muñoz-Catalán, M., Barrera, V.J. y León, F. (2016). Construcción de conocimiento sobre características de aprendizaje de las matemáticas a través del análisis de videos. AIEM, 86(9), 85-103
Cohen, L., Manion. L. y Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Crespo, S. (2020). En La Lucha/in the Struggle for Mathematics Teacher Education Without Borders. En Radakovic, N. y Jao, L. (Eds.) Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education, Springer International Publishing: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4a ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jankvist, U., Sánchez Aguilar, M., Bergman Ärlebäck, J., y Wæge, K. (2015). TWG23: Implementation of research findings in mathematics education Introduction to the papers of TWG23: Implementation of research findings in mathematics education. CERME 10, Feb 2017, Dublin, Ireland. hal-01950532
Kobiela, M. y Zanazanian, P. (2020). Crossing Disciplinary Borders in Pre-service Teacher Education: Historical Consciousness as a Tool to Develop Awareness of Mathematical Positionality to Achieve Epistemic Change. En Radakovic, N. y Jao, L. (Eds.) Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education, Springer International Publishing: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Ivars, P., Fernandez, F. y Llinares, S. (2019). Principles In The Design Of Tasks To Support Preservice Teachers’ Noticing Enhancement. En M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien & P. Vale (Eds.). Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 408-415). Pretoria, South Africa: PME.
Montes, M., Carrillo, J., Contreras, L. C., Liñán-García, M. M. y Barrera-Castarnado, V. J. (2019). Estructurando la formación inicial de profesores de matemáticas: una propuesta desde el modelo MTSK. En E. Badillo, N. Climent, C. Fernández y M. T. González (Eds.), Investigación sobre el profesor de matemáticas: formación, práctica de aula, conocimiento y competencia profesional (pp. 157-176). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.
Montes, M., Climent, N., Carrillo, J. y Contreras, L. (2019). Constructing tasks for primary teacher education from the perspective of Mathematics Teachers’ Specialised Knowledge. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands. ffhal-02430479f
O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
Pochulu, M., Font, V. y Rodríguez, M. (2016). Desarrollo de la competencia en análisis didáctico. Relime, 19 (1), 71-98.
Radakovic, N. y Jao, L. (2020). Borders in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Education. Springer International Publishing: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Rey-Herrera, J. M., y Candela, A. (2013). La construcción discursiva del conocimiento científico en el aula. Educación Y Educadores, 16(1). Recuperado a partir de https://educacionyeducadores.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/eye/article/view/2411
Ruiz-Ortega, F. J., y Dussan Luberth, C. (2021). Competencia argumentativa: un factor clave en la formación de docentes. Educación Y Educadores, 24(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.5294/educ.2021.24.1.2
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for the learning of mathematics, 26(2), 114-145.
Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Education, 4: 1-94.
Watson, A. y Ohtani, M. (2015). Themes and issues in mathematics education concerning task design: Editorial introduction. In A.Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 3–15). New York: Springer. 2015. p. 3-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jonathan Cervantes-Barraza, Leonardo Vargas Delgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Proposed Policy for Open Access Journals
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to use the published work as long as the authorship and first publication in this journal are acknowledged.
- Authors can enter into additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as the first publication in this journal is acknowledged.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., on institutional or personal websites) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
