Media discourse on chilean dynamic capacities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v21i1.3462Keywords:
Dynamic Capabilities, Chile, Discourse AnalysisAbstract
Within the social and economic context of Chile, a qualitative investigation is conducted aiming to describe the conceptual characteristics of media discourses associated with the dynamic capabilities of organizations. The study identifies 16 significant constructs that articulate a discourse, which establishes the political causes involved in the dynamism of the environment and the social foundations of firm capabilities. The result is a process map that describes the prevailing mental model commonly found in the analyzed media discourses.
References
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., y Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 41, 757-774.
Andrews, K.R. (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Irwin, Homewood. Open Journal of Business and Management, Vol.2 No.3, July 25, 2014
Augusto Felício, J., Couto, E., y Caiado, J. (2014). Human capital, social capital and organizational performance. Management decision, 52(2), 350-364.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., y Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic management of open innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77-94.
Billi, M., Urquiza Gómez, A., & Feres Klenner, C. (2017). Environmental communication and non-conventional renewable energy projects. content analysis of chilean mass media. Revista Latina De Comunicacion Social, 72, 1218-1237. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2017-1216
Camus, P. A., Ponce, N., Contreras, F. C., & Del Valle Tapia, M. (2018). Critical discourse analysis: The higher education reform in chile in written media. [Análisis crítico del discurso: La reforma a la educación superior en Chile en medios de comunicación escritos] Revista Colombiana De Educacion, (75), 77-98. doi:10.17227/rce.num75-8102
Chamberlin, E. (1933) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. The Economic Journal, Volume 43, Issue 172, 1 December, Pages 661–666, https://doi.org/10.2307/2224511
Cohen, W. M., y Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Cyert, R. and March, J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
D’Aveni RA. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. Free Press: New York.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of business venturing, 30(5), 674-695.
Giuliani, E., y Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research policy, 34(1), 47-68.
Herrera, D. I. (2020). Discourse analysis in the hybrid media system: A methodological approach. [Análisis discursivo en sistemas híbridos de medios: Una aproximación metodológica] Logos: Revista De Linguistica, Filosofia y Literatura, 30(2), 314-330. doi:10.15443/RL3024
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133
Honda, A., de Araujo Oliveira, S. R., Ridde, V., Zinszer, K., y Gautier, L. (2023). Attributes and Organizational Factors that Enabled Innovation in Health Care Service Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic–Case Studies from Brazil, Canada and Japan. Health Systems y Reform, 9(2), 2176022.
Hoppe, M. (2018). The Prime Mover Matrix: A Conversation Piece for Building Strategic Innovative Capacity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(7), 5-13.
Jin, C. H., y Lee, J. Y. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurship on managerial innovation capacity: The moderating effects of policy finance and management support. South African journal of business management, 51(1), 1-13.
Kitsios, F., y Kamariotou, M. (2021). Information Systems Strategy and Innovation: Analyzing Perceptions Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Laursen, K., y Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150.
Lessard, D., Teece, D. J., y Leih, S. (2016). The dynamic capabilities of Meta‐multinationals. Global Strategy Journal, 6(3), 211-224.
Mancuso, I., Petruzzelli, A. M., y Panniello, U. (2023). Innovating agri-food business models after the Covid-19 pandemic: The impact of digital technologies on the value creation and value capture mechanisms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122404.
Martínez Ardila, H. E., Mora Moreno, J. E., y Camacho Pico, J. A. (2020). Networks of collaborative alliances: the second order interfirm technological distance and innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 1255-1282.
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of management journal, 44(1), 118-131.
Moon, T. (2010). Organizational cultural intelligence: Dynamic capability perspective. Group y Organization Management, 35(4), 456-493.
Mowery, D. C., Malerba, F., Dosi, G., y Teece, D. J. (2019). Introduction: Nathan Rosenberg as a founding father of the economics of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(2), 283-288.
Nelson, R. y Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Petit, N., y Teece, D. J. (2021). Innovating big tech firms and competition policy: favoring dynamic over static competition. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(5), 1168-1198.
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., y Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3‐4), 137-168.
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (John Murray, London). In: Sraffa, P., Ed., The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1951.
Richardson, G. B. (1972) The Organisation of Industry, The Economic Journal, Volume 82, Issue 327, Pages 883–896, https://doi.org/10.2307/2230256
Schilling, M. A., y Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management science, 53(7), 1113-1126.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy: Third Edition. Reino Unido: HarperCollins.
Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Harriman House Limited, 2010.
Son, I., Kim, J., Park, G., y Kim, S. (2018). The impact of innovative technology exploration on firm value sustainability: The case of part supplier management. Sustainability, 10(10), 3632.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., y Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Thakker, A., y Sun, D. (2023). Handmade papers: Innovation, Technology, and Design. Journal of Natural Fibers, 20(1), 2187505.
Williamson, O. E. (1999). Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic management journal, 20(12), 1087-1108.
Zaheer, A., y Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic management journal, 26(9), 809-825.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Álvarez-Maldonado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Instructions for filling in the Certification of Originality and the Copyright Transfer:
Keep in mind that by pressing the "save and continue" button at the end, you are assuming all the ethical and legal commitments set forth herein. They establish the responsibilities of the legislation on intellectual property rights. For this it is assumed that whoever is carrying out the action of presenting the written work in good faith and represents himself and the other authors of the postulated article.
In this sense, the authors retain all the rights of which they are owners and authorize the free reproduction of the document sent. In the event of being necessary, they will assume, by pressing the "save and continue" button, the legal responsibility derived from the patrimonial rights which are free because of the non-payment by any procedure of the Journal.
Consequently, the author (s) represented by the person who advances the postulation of the article for evaluation and eventual publication,
I (We) declare:
1. I am (we are) the author (s) of the article {here is the name of the article placed automatically}.
2. This is an original work in accordance with the intellectual property law of Colombian copyright.
3. The content of the article of the reference has not been published and that it will not be submitted to any other means of publication in written or electronic support before knowing the decision of the Editorial Committee of Dimensión Empresarial.
4. The signer of this certification guarantees that the commitment acquired here does not infringe any third-party rights.
5. The publication authorization includes its electronic file and its adaptation, if necessary, for its incorporation in the network or in any electronic format or database, as well as attaching the necessary metadata to register the work, trademarks of water or any other security or protection system.
6. The publication authorization includes reproduction on digital media. As well as its distribution and making available through institutional archives through the Internet, distribute copies, and exhibit it in Colombia and outside the country, as well as include the article in national and international indexes.
7. The author assumes all responsibility, including compensation for damages, that could be exercised against the Universidad Autónoma del Caribe by third parties who violated their rights and interests because of the assignment.
For its part, Dimension Empresarial undertakes to respect in any case the rights of the author contained in Article 30 of Law 23 of 1982, or any after it and will make the article available to the users of the Journal so that make a legitimate use of it, as permitted by the applicable legislation, provided that its authorship is cited, commercial benefit is not obtained, and derivative works are not made.
The authors agree to accept the conditions of this intellectual property note, which will be applied to this submission when it is published in this journal.