Conception on the evaluative practice of the teachers in distance studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v18i02.2317

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to unveil the conception on the evaluative practices who have teachers of the National Open University of Venezuela (UNA, in Spanish). It was made a qualitative and ethnographic research. Observation and interview techniques were used to collect information. The key informants were content specialists, evaluators and advisors of the UNA. The research findings were that the evaluative practices of teachers and the vision they have about them are rooted in the technical conception of teaching and in the second generation of evaluation, because this is how the educational and evaluative model of UNA is thought.

KEYWORDS: Evaluation practice, Evaluation of learning, Teaching conception.

Author Biography

Aarom Oramas, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA

Bachelor of education, mention of philosophy graduated from the Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB). Specialist in planning and evaluation of education of the Universidad Santa María (USM). Master of education, mention evaluation education of the Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador (UPEL). Ordinary professor at the National Open University (UNA), he works as an Instructional Designer and Evaluator. He is responsible for the Research Line "Teaching Theories: Bases for Teacher Training, School Life, Curricular Production and Educational Research" of the Education Research Group (GIDE). He has 24 years of experience in teaching at the General and University Secondary Education levels. In addition, it participates in the Research Line "Field of Learning Difficulties and its relationship with educational practice" and in projects related to the care of students with disabilities at UNA.

Published

2020-07-30 — Updated on 2020-09-08

Versions

How to Cite

Oramas, A. (2020). Conception on the evaluative practice of the teachers in distance studies. REVISTA ENCUENTROS, 18(02). https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v18i02.2317 (Original work published July 30, 2020)