Translation of knowledge of free and open source software in cultural works
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/encuen.v19i01.2489Keywords:
Access to information, Open access, Open knowledge, Free cultural worksAbstract
Open source rhetoric is increasingly being applied to culture, but there is little consensus on what it means in this area. The objective of this work is to understand the translation processes of linguistic knowledge from the free and open source software movements to the circulation of cultural works during the 2000s. The qualitative research methodology used is the multiple case study. The units of analysis are the Open Access, Open Knowledge and Free Cultural Works initiatives. The technique used is the documentary review. The article explores the resignifications produced in the translations and points out a group of non-profit organizations governing these processes.
References
REFERENCIAS
Albagli, S. (2015). Open science in question. En S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel & A. H. Abdo (eds.). Open Science, open issues (pp. 9-25). Brasilia, Brasil: Ibict.
BioMed Central Ltd. (2002). Article-processing charges. BioMed Central. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3aEDqHr
Budapest Open Access Initiative [BOAI]. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3cLQ5LC
Castells, M. (2000). La sociedad red. En La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura (Vol. 1). Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
Cornell University. (2019). About arXiv. arXiv.org. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://arxiv.org/about
Distributed Proofreaders Foundation. (2016). Distributed Proofreaders Foundation. Distributed Proofreaders. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3jnFDej
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research & Innovation. (2016). H2020 Programme. Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020. Version 3.0. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/36Mm2Q2
Evangelista, R. (2014). O movimento software livre do Brasil: política, trabalho e hacking. Horizontes Antropológicos, 20(41), 173-200. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3pUwMn3
Free Cultural Works [FCW]. (2006). Announcement. Definition of Free Cultural Works. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://freedomdefined.org/Announcement.
FCW. (2007). Definition. Definition of Free Cultural Works. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2N0qP9k
Free Software Foundation [FSF]. (2017). Overview of the GNU System. GNU Operating System. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/39SuCij
FSF. (2019). What is free software? GNU Operating System. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3cXXQyf
FSF. (2020a). Licenses. GNU Operating System. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/39QJvS0
FSF. (2020b). Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software. GNU Operating System. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/36Mh7id
Gaete, T. (2013). La transformación de la sociedad desde el movimiento social del software libre. Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad, 12(2), 62-71.
Garcia, M. N., Braga dos Santos, S., da Silva Pereira, R., & Bedineli Rossi, G. (2010). Software Livre Em Relação Ao Software Proprietário: Aspectos Favoráveis E Desfavoráveis Percebidos Por Especialistas. Gestão & Regionalidade, 26(78), 106-20. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3aEZrpO
Georgopoulou, P. (2009). The free/open source software movement Resistance or change? Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 9(1), 65-76. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3oXA2wp
Ginsparg, P. (2011). ArXiv at 20. Nature, 476(7359), 145-47.
Hart, M. (1992). The History and Philosophy of Project Gutenberg by Michael Hart. Project Gutenberg. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3rwet89
Institute of Education Sciences. (2014). 50 Years of ERIC. 1964-2014. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://eric.ed.gov/pdf/ERIC_Retrospective.pdf
Larivière, V., Haustein, S. & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), 1-15. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Lessig, L. (2005). Cultura libre: Cómo los grandes medios usan la tecnología y las leyes para encerrar la cultura y controlar la creatividad. Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones.
Lindman, J. (2014). Similarities of Open Data and Open Source: Impacts on Business. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 9(3), 46-70. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3pVuC6r
Luchilo, L. J. (2019). Revistas científicas: oligopolio y acceso abierto. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 14(40), 41-79. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3oVkRUF
Machado, J. (2015). Open data and open science. En S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel & A. H. Abdo (eds.). Open Science, open issues (pp. 189-214). Brasilia, Brasil: Ibict.
Mako Hill, B. (2006). Toward a Definition of Freedom. Wikimania 2006. Cambridge, Estados Unidos. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3aHyCBr
Mako Hill, B. (2007). Free Culture Advanced. Benjamin Mako Hill. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3jnapnG
Mako Hill, B. (2008). About me. Benjamin Mako Hill. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2MBqZ7i
Mike. (2008). Approved for Free Cultural Works. Creative Commons. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3tuFj2f
Mochi Alemán, P. O. (2002). El movimiento del software libre. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 45(185), 73-89. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2N3FrVt
Molloy, J. C. (2011). The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science. PLoS Biology, 9(12), 1-4. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3oWCN14
Moody, G. (2002). Rebel Code: The Inside Story of Linux and the Open Source Revolution. New York, Estados Unidos: Basic Books.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2007). OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Paris, Francia: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2Lnxz0G
OECD. (2004). Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3oXmuRI
Open Knowledge Foundation [OKF]. (2004a). About the Open Knowledge Foundation. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3pT2mkV
OKF. (2004b). Friends of the Creative Domain. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3pUxRv7
OKF. (2004c). OKF KnowledgeForge Project. Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3rxh4id
OKF. (2005). Governance of the Open Knowledge Foundation Network. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2O0iT8D
OKF. (2006a). The Open Knowledge Definition. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2LrkMKM
OKF. (2006b). The Open Knowledge Definition. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2N3pn64
OKF. (2015). Open Definition. The Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de http://opendefinition.org/history/
Paskevicius, M, Veletsianos, G. & Kimmons, R. (2018). Content is King: An Analysis of How the Twitter Discourse Surrounding Open Education Unfolded From 2009 to 2016. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 116-137. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/36ITert
Peterson, C. (2018). How I coined the term “open source”. Opensource.com. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://red.ht/3tGEtzA
Pollock, R. (2004a). Open Knowledge Foundation Launched. Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/39SCL6h
Pollock, R. (2004b). The Three Meanings of Open. Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2N0sqvQ
Pollock, R. (2004c). Why the Open Knowledge Foundation. Open Knowledge Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2MV0z0e
Pomerantz, J., & Peek, R. (2016). Fifty Shades of Open. First Monday, 21(5). Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3pXC5lu
Raffo, J. (2011). Derecho autoral: hacia un nuevo paradigma. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Marcial Pons Argentina.
Renn, J. (2014). Beyond Editions: Historical Sources in the Digital Age. En M. Stolz y Y.-C. Chen (eds.). Internationalität und Interdisziplinarität der Editionswissenschaft (pp. 9-28). Berlin, Alemania: De Gruyter.
Rodríguez Yunta, L. (2009). Las bases de datos documentales del CSIC en el desarrollo histórico del mercado de la información en España (desde sus antecedentes hasta 2008). En L. Rodríguez Yunta y E. Giménez Toledo. La documentación como servicio público: Estudios en homenaje a Adelaida Román (pp. 133-74). Madrid, España: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Rullani, E. (2004). El capitalismo cognitivo: ¿Un déjà-vu? En O. Blondeau, N. Dyer Whiteford, C. Vercellone, A. Kyrou, A. Corsani, E. Rullani, Y. Moulier Boutang y M. Lazzarato. Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva (pp. 99-106). Madrid, España: Traficantes de Sueños.
Sin autor. (2003a). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Open Access Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/3oTXbjF
Sin autor. (2003b). Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. The SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://bit.ly/2MU8cUF
Software in the Public Interest. (2019). Home. SPI. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://www.spi-inc.org/
Springer Nature. (2004). Open Choice: Springer adds new publication model. Springer. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/9Xrfz2Rl
Suber, P. (2012). Budapest Open Access Initiative: Frequently Asked Questions. The SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/kZ7X
Torvalds, L. (1992). Release Notes for Linux v0.12. Linux Kernel Archives. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/us61q
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2011). United States National Library of Medicine. 1836-2011. U.S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/RieN
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2019). PubMed Overview. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/HvXCZEdc
Vardouli, T. & Buechley, L. (2014). Open Source Architecture: An Exploration of Source Code and Access in Architectural Design. Leonardo, 47(1), 51-55. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85899
Verón, E. (1999). Entre la epistemología y la comunicación. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, (4), 149-156. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/lQV9aho
Wikimedia Foundation. (2007). Resolution:Licensing policy. Wikimedia Foundation. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Estados Unidos: SAGE Publications.
Zanotti, A. (2014). El software libre y el campo de producción cordobés: agentes, comunidades, disputas. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Zukerfeld, M. (2005). Bienes informacionales y capitalismo. En J. Arboleya (ed.). Concurso Pensar a Contracorriente (Vol. 2). La Habana, Cuba: Editorial Ciencias Sociales.
Zukerfeld, M. (2010a). Capitalismo y Conocimiento: Materialismo Cognitivo, Propiedad Intelectual y Capitalismo Informacional (Vol. 1). Tesis doctoral no publicada, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Zukerfeld, M. (2010b). Capitalismo y Conocimiento: Materialismo Cognitivo, Propiedad Intelectual y Capitalismo Informacional (Vol. 2). Tesis doctoral no publicada, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Zukerfeld, M. (2014). Todo lo que usted quiso saber sobre Internet pero nunca se atrevió a googlear. Hipertextos: Capitalismo, Técnica y Sociedad en debate, 1(2), 64-103. Recuperado el 08-07-2020, de https://cutlink.link/TynUwCh0
Zukerfeld, M. (2017a). Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism. London, Reino Unido: University of Westminster Press.
Zukerfeld, M. (2017b). The tale of the snake and the elephant: Intellectual property expansion under informational capitalism. The Information Society, 33(5), 243-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Antonela Isoglio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Proposed Policy for Open Access Journals
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to use the published work as long as the authorship and first publication in this journal are acknowledged.
- Authors can enter into additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as the first publication in this journal is acknowledged.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., on institutional or personal websites) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).