O que sabemos sobre noticias falsas? Uma análise bibliometrica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/encuen.v20i02-Julio-dic..2756Palavras-chave:
Noticias falsas, posverdad, bibliometría, redes socialesResumo
As noticias falsas se espalham freqüentemente nos meios sociais com implicações significativa na opinião pública, fenómeno que incrementa o interesse academico en estudar. Essa investigação propõe resumir o corpo da literatura desenvolvido ao redor de notícias falsas através dos análisis bibliométrica. para isso ,são analisados 1213 documentos sobre o assunto,extraídos do SCOPUS. Indicadores são construídos indentificar a evolução da produção científica, revistas autores e organizações mais importantes, países com maior produção, redes de acoplamento bibliográfico e termos de maior ocorrência. Os resultados sugerem que os estudos sobre FAKE NEWS aumentaram desde 2016, coincidindo com o brexit e as eleições nos EE. E a indentificação de seis clusteres que podem orientar pesquisas futuras reconhecendo tendências científicas.
Referências
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 elections. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-36.
Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P. & Loannidis, S. (2020). A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks. Expert systems with applications, 114006. DOI: 10.1016 / j.eswa.2020.114006
Baccarella, C. V., Wagner, T. F., Kietzmann, J. H., & McCarthy, I. P. (2018). Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. European Management Journal, 36(4), 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.07.002.
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2017). Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
Balmas, M. (2012). When fake news becomes real. Communication Research, 41(3), 430–454. doi:10.1177/0093650212453600.
Barišić, P. (2018). Truth and politics in the age of digital media. Synthesis Philosophica, 33 (2), 489–501. DOI: 10.21464 / sp33211
Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2017). The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review. 089443931773415. doi:10.1177/0894439317734157
Bates, N., & Sousa, S. C. (2020, July). Investigating Users’ Perceived Credibility of Real and Fake News Posts in Facebook’s News Feed: UK Case Study. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 174-180). Springer, Cham.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. doi:10.1177/0267323118760317.
Berghel, H. (2017). Lies, damn lies and fake news. Computer, 50 (2), 80–85. DOI: 10.1109 / mc.2017.56
Blanco-Herrero, D. & Calderón, CA (2019). Dissemination and receipt of false news that promotes hate speech against migrants and refugees on social media. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Ecosystem
Brashier, N. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2020). Aging in an Era of Fake News. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 096372142091587. doi:10.1177/0963721420915872
Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 194016122096478. doi:10.1177/1940161220964780
Calvillo, DP, Ross, BJ, García, RJB, Smelter, TJ y Rutchick, AM (2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the COVID-19 threat (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Sciences of social psychology and personality, 194855062094053. doi: 10.1177 / 1948550620940539
Camps, D., Recuero, Y., Avila, R. E., & Samar, M. E. (2006). Bibliometric study of a volume of the journal Archives of Medicine. Archives of Medicine, 2(3).
Chen, Y., Conroy, N. J., & Rubin, V. L. (2015). Misleading Online Content. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection - WMDD ’15. doi:10.1145/2823465.2823467.
Corneille, O., Mierop, A. y Unkelbach, C. (2020). Repetition increases both the perceived truthfulness and the falsity of the information: an ecological explanation. Cognition, 205, 104470. DOI: 10.1016 / j.cognition.2020.104470
De keersmaecker J, & Roets, A. (2017). “Fake news”: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence, 65, 107–110. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.005.
De Souza, JV, Gomes, J., Souza Filho, FM de, Oliveira Julio, AM de, & de Souza, JF (2020). A systematic mapping on the automatic classification of fake news on social networks. Social media analysis and mining, 10 (1). DOI: 10.1007 / s13278-020-00659-2
Dobreva, D., Grinnell, D. & Innes, M. (2019). Prophets and loss: how "soft facts" on social media influenced the Brexit campaign and social reactions to the murder of Jo Cox MP. Politics and Internet .doi: 10.1002 / poi3.203
Fishkin, J. (2018-07-12). Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation. : Oxford University Press. Retrieved 27 Oct. 2020.
García-Marín, D. (2020). Global infodemic: information disruptions, false narratives and fact-checking during the covid-19 crisis. Information Professional, 29 (4).
Gorbea Portal, Salvador. (2016). Una nueva perspectiva teórica de la bibliometría basada en su dimensión histórica y sus referentes temporales. Investigación bibliotecológica, 30(70), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.10.001
Granik, M., & Mesyura, V. (2017). Fake news detection using naive Bayes classifier. 2017 IEEE First Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON). doi:10.1109/ukrcon.2017.8100379.
Hartley, K. y Vu, MK (2020). Fighting Fake News in the Age of COVID-19: Policy Insights from a Balance Model. Political science, 53 (4), 735-758.
Harsin, J. (2015). Post-truth, post-politics and attention regimes of economics. Communication, Culture And Criticism. 8 (2), 327–333. DOI: 10.1111 / cccr.12097
Himma-Kadakas, M. (2017). Alternative facts and fake news that enter the journalistic content production cycle. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9 (2), 25.
Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034.
Jankowski, NW (2018). Fake news investigation: A selective examination of empirical studies. Javnost - The Public, 25 (1-2), 248-255. DOI: 10.1080 / 13183222.2018.1418964
Khaldarova, I., & Pantti, M. (2016). Fake News. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 891–901. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1163237.
Koohikamali, M., & Sidorova, A. (2017). Information Re-Sharing on Social Network Sites in the Age of Fake News. Informing Science, 20.
Kshetri, N. & Voas, J. (2017).The "fake news" economy". Profesional de TI, 19 (6), 8–12. DOI: 10.1109 / mitp.2017.4241459
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
Lotero-Echeverri, G., Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., & Pérez-Rodríguez, M. A. (2018). Fact-checking vs. Fake news: Confirmation journalism as a component of media competition against disinformation
Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246–262. doi:10.1177/0196859912458700.
Martel, C., Pennycook, G. y Rand, DG (2020). Confidence in emotions promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 5 (1). DOI: 10.1186 / s41235-020-00252-3
Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in “Post-Fact” Society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441–454. doi:10.1177/0002764217701217.
Nelson, J. L., & Taneja, H. (2018). The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumption. New Media & Society, 146144481875871. doi:10.1177/1461444818758715
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521-2526.
Pritchard, Alan. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?. Journal of Documentation. 25. 348-349.
Quandt, T. (2018). Dark Participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36-48. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519.
Rochlin, N. (2017). Fake news: belief in post-truth. Library Hi Tech, 35 (3), 386–392. DOI: 10.1108 / lht-03-2017-0062
Rodrigues, Usha M; Xu, Jian (2020). Regulación de la infodemia de noticias falsas COVID-19 en China e India. Media International Australia, (), 1329878X2094820–. doi: 10.1177 / 1329878X2094820
San Martín, J., Drubi, F., & Pérez, D. R. (2020). Uncritical polarized groups: The impact of spreading fake news as fact in social networks. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 178, 192-206.
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201805871. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D. y Liu, H. (2018). Fakenewsnet - A data repository with news content, social context, and dynamic information for studying fake news on social media. preimpresión de arXiv arXiv: 1809.01286 , 8
Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150–160. doi:10.1177/0266382117722446.
Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Singh, D., Virk, GS y Salo, J. (2020). Sharing fake news on social networks: application of the honeycomb framework and the hypothesis of the third person effect. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102197. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jretconser.2020.102197
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “Fake News.” Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143.
Thakur, A., Shinde, S., Patil, T., Gaud, B. & Babanne, V. (2020). MYTHYA: Fake news detector, extractor and real-time news sorter. IV International Congress of Trends in Electronics and Informatics 2020 (ICOEI) (48184). DOI: 10.1109 / icoei48184.2020.9142971
Tomás-Górriz, Vicente & Tomás-Casterá, Vicente. (2018). La Bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio. 2. 145. 10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51.
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodríguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A. y Ortega-García, J. (2020). DeepFakes and More: A Survey on Facial Tampering and Fake Detection. Information fusion. doi: 10.1016 / j.inffus.2020.06.014
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049.
Vos, Tim P.; Hanusch, Folker; Dimitrakopoulou, Dimitra; Geertsema-Sligh, Margaretha; Sehl, Annika (2019). The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies || Fake News. , 10.1002/9781118841570(), 1–6. doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0128
Vosoughi, S., Mohsenvand, M. “Neo”, & Roy, D. (2017). Rumor Gauge. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 11(4), 1–36. doi:10.1145/3070644
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is What Happens to News. Journalism Studies, 1–13. doi:10.1080/1461670x.2018.1492881
Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 112552. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552.
Waszak, P. M., Kasprzycka-Waszak, W., & Kubanek, A. (2018). The spread of medical fake news in social media – The pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 115–118. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.03.002
Wu, L., & Liu, H. (2018). Tracing Fake-News Footprints. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM ’18. doi:10.1145/3159652.3159677
Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, T. (2020). Edge Computing and Blockchain for Quick Fake News Detection in IoV. Sensors, 20(16), 4360. doi:10.3390/s20164360
Yavary, A., Sajedi, H. y Saniee Abadeh, M. (2019). Verification of information in social networks based on comments from users and news agencies. Social media analysis and mining, 10 (1). DOI: 10.1007 / s13278-019-0616-4
Zhao, Z., Zhao, J., Sano, Y., Levy, O., Takayasu, H., Takayasu, M.,… Havlin, S. (2020). Fake news propagates differently from real news even at early stages of spreading. EPJ Data Science, 9 (1). DOI: 10.1140 / epjds / s13688-020-00224-z
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
##submission.downloads##
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Carlors Fernando Osorio Andrade, Edwin Arango, Hector Augusto Rodriguez Orejuela
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Política propuesta para revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
