Systematic Review of Living Lab Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v18i(1).2018Abstract
Living laboratories are spaces that group research, analysis and experimentation to achieve answers to social, business, technological and environmental problems. For this, a systematic review of the existing literature of the concept was carried out: its origin, characteristics, most important contexts and establish how it relates to innovation. Scientific documents were reviewed from the available academic literature of the different theoretical approaches and it was concluded that with the analysis of the theoretical concept this methodological tool can be understood in its contribution to the innovation processes.
References
Almirall, E. Wareham, J., (2009). Contributions of Living Labs in Reducing Market Based Risk. International Conference on Concurrent Enterpreise.
Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Wareham, J. (2012). Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 12– 18. http://timreview.ca/article/603
Ballon, P., Pierson, J., & Delaere, S. (2005). Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation: examining european practice. In Open Innovation Platforms For Broadband Services: Benchmarking European Practices (Open Innovation Platforms For Broadband Services: Benchmarking European Practices). Paper for the 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Porto (Portugal), 4-6 September 2005..
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Living Lab: An Open and Citizen-Centric Approach for Innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4): 356–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727
Boateng, R. (2011). Do organizations learn when employees learn: the link between individual and organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 6-9.
Chesbrough, H. W., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open inno- vation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W.
Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation, 3-28.ENoLL. (2016). What is a Living Lab?
European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL), Último acceso October 8, 2017: http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/FAQ
Chesbrough HW, Growther AK. (2006). Beyond high- tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries, R&D Management, 229-236.
Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., & Kulkki. S. (2005). State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User- Centric ICT Innovation – A European Approach. Center for Distance-spanning Technology. Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. Nokia Oy, Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Helsinki School of Economics, Finland.
Følstad, A. (2008). Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Communication Technology: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10: 99–131.
Fulgencio, H., Le Fever, H., & Katzy, B. (2012). Living Lab: Innovation through Pastiche (A Research Linking Disparate and Discorded Ontology). In Proceedings of eChallenges e-2012, Lisbon, Portugal, October 17–19.
Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. - K. 2015. Contextuality and Co-Creation Matter: A Qualitative Case Study Comparison of Living Lab Concepts in Urban Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/952
Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, 223-228.
Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
Guzmán, J. G., del Carpio, A. F., Colomo-Palacios, R. & de Diego, M. V. (2013). Living Labs for User-Driven Innovation A Process Reference Model, Research-Technology Management, 29-39.
Hakkarainen, L., & Hyysalo, S. (2016). The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 45–58. http://timreview.ca/article/960
Intille, S. S., Larson, K., Munguia Tapia, E., Beaudin, J., Kaushik, P., Nawyn, J., & R. Rockinson, R. 2006. Using a Live-In Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research. In K. P. Fishkin, B. Schiele, P. Nixon, & A. Quigley (Eds.), Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2006, LNCS 3968: 349-365. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Katzy, B. (2012). Designing Viable Business Models for Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 19–24. http://timreview.ca/article/604
Leminen, S. (2015). Q&A. What Are Living Labs? Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 29–35. http://timreview.ca/article/928
Leminen, S. 2013. Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 5–14. http://timreview.ca/article/740
Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2009). From Innovation Networks to Open Innovation Communities: Co- Creating Value with Customers and Users, Marseilles, France, September 3–5.
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström A.-G. (2012). Living Labs as Open Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6–11. http://timreview.ca/article/602
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A.-G. (2014). On Becoming Creative Consumers – User Roles in Living Labs Networks. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 9(1): 33–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2014.058082
Mabrouki, O., Chibani, A., Amirat, Y., Valenzuela Fernandez, M. & Navarro de la Cruz, M. (2010). Context- Aware Collaborative Platform in Rural Living Labs, 65-76
Mulder, I.J., Stappers, P.J., (2009). Co-creating in practice: results and challenges. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE 2009, "Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities", Thoben, K.D., Pawar, K.S.,
Katzy, B. & Bierwolf, R, 1-8.Niitamo, V.-
Mulder, I. 2012. Living Labbing the Rotterdam Way: Co-Creation as an Enabler for Urban Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 39-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/607
Niitamo, V.-P., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2012. A Small-Firm Perspective on the Benefits of Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 44–49. http://timreview.ca/article/608
Oestmann & Dymond, Telecentres - experiences, lessons and trends, in the commonwealth of learning. 2001
Rits, O., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2015. Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 19-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949
Ståhlbröst, A., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. 2011. Exploring Users Motivation in Innovation Communities. International Journal Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, (14)4: 298–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2011.043051
Ståhlbröst, A. (2012). A Living Lab as a Service: Creating Value for Micro-enterprises through Collaboration and Innovation, Technology Innovation Management Review, 37–42.
Ståhlbröst, A., (2008). Forming Future IT: The Living Lab Way of User Involvement. Doctoral Thesis: Lulea University of Technology.
Ståhlbröst, A. 2013. A Living Lab as a Service: Creating Value for Micro-enterprises through Collaboration and Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 37-42. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/744
Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2013 Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, (3)11: 28–36. http://timreview.ca/article/743
Schuurman, D. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University, Belgium.
Schaffers, H. & Turkama, P. (2012) Living Labs for cross-border systemic innovation, Technology Innovation Management Review, 25–30.
Tranfield, D., Deyen, D., y Smart P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Advanced Management Research Centre (AMRC). British Journal of Management Cranfield School of Management: Cranfield University.. Vol. (14), p. 207-222.
Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2011. Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1): 9–25. http://timreview.ca/article/489
Wolfert, J., Verdouw, C. N., Verloop, C. M. & Beulensb, A. J. M. (2010). Organizing information integration in agri-food – A method based on a service-oriented architecture and Living Lab approach, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 389-405.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Instructions for filling in the Certification of Originality and the Copyright Transfer:
Keep in mind that by pressing the "save and continue" button at the end, you are assuming all the ethical and legal commitments set forth herein. They establish the responsibilities of the legislation on intellectual property rights. For this it is assumed that whoever is carrying out the action of presenting the written work in good faith and represents himself and the other authors of the postulated article.
In this sense, the authors retain all the rights of which they are owners and authorize the free reproduction of the document sent. In the event of being necessary, they will assume, by pressing the "save and continue" button, the legal responsibility derived from the patrimonial rights which are free because of the non-payment by any procedure of the Journal.
Consequently, the author (s) represented by the person who advances the postulation of the article for evaluation and eventual publication,
I (We) declare:
1. I am (we are) the author (s) of the article {here is the name of the article placed automatically}.
2. This is an original work in accordance with the intellectual property law of Colombian copyright.
3. The content of the article of the reference has not been published and that it will not be submitted to any other means of publication in written or electronic support before knowing the decision of the Editorial Committee of Dimensión Empresarial.
4. The signer of this certification guarantees that the commitment acquired here does not infringe any third-party rights.
5. The publication authorization includes its electronic file and its adaptation, if necessary, for its incorporation in the network or in any electronic format or database, as well as attaching the necessary metadata to register the work, trademarks of water or any other security or protection system.
6. The publication authorization includes reproduction on digital media. As well as its distribution and making available through institutional archives through the Internet, distribute copies, and exhibit it in Colombia and outside the country, as well as include the article in national and international indexes.
7. The author assumes all responsibility, including compensation for damages, that could be exercised against the Universidad Autónoma del Caribe by third parties who violated their rights and interests because of the assignment.
For its part, Dimension Empresarial undertakes to respect in any case the rights of the author contained in Article 30 of Law 23 of 1982, or any after it and will make the article available to the users of the Journal so that make a legitimate use of it, as permitted by the applicable legislation, provided that its authorship is cited, commercial benefit is not obtained, and derivative works are not made.
The authors agree to accept the conditions of this intellectual property note, which will be applied to this submission when it is published in this journal.
