Teaching management in engineering schools: a practical approach

Autores/as

  • Orlando Enrique Contreras Pacheco Universidad Industrial de Santander
  • Aura Cecilia Pedraza Avella Universidad Industrial de Santander
  • Alejandra Barbosa Calderón Universidad Industrial de Santander

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v15i2.1059

Palabras clave:

Pedagogy in management, teaching-case methodology, ICT for education, action-research

Resumen

By means of an action-research approach, this paper is an account of a comprehensive academic experience. It was performed and assesed using a sample of 344 participants, distributed in 12 different groups who were part of the bachelor degree program in Industrial Engineering at a Colombian university.  To this end, a set of pedagogical practices, based mainly on teaching cases supported by ICT tools was implemented. This study includes a summary of each case developed, a description of their implementation and their assessment process and results. Outcomes indicate that according to student’s perceptions, there is a clear superiority of these initiatives over traditional teaching techniques based on conventional lectures, even after six months of the experience. It contributes by encouraging the transfer of this knowledge into some other contexts in order to stimulate further development and to help in the creation of better educational processes for future professionals in engineering, as well as in other professions.

Resumen

Este trabajo documenta una amplia experiencia académica que, mediante un enfoque de investigación-acción, se completó con una muestra de 344 participantes, distribuidos en 12 grupos diferentes que formaban parte del programa en Ingeniería Industrial de una universidad colombiana. Para ello, se implementó un conjunto de prácticas pedagógicas, basadas principalmente en casos de enseñanza apoyados por herramientas TIC. Este estudio incluye un resumen de cada caso desarrollado, una descripción de su implementación y su proceso de evaluación y resultados. Los resultados indican que, según las percepciones de los estudiantes, existe una clara superioridad de estas iniciativas sobre las técnicas de enseñanza tradicionales basadas en clases convencionales, incluso después de seis meses de experiencia. Contribuye a fomentar la transferencia de este conocimiento a otros contextos, con el fin de estimular su desarrollo y a desarrollar mejores procesos educativos para futuros profesionales en ingeniería, así como en otras profesiones.

Resumo

Este trabalho documenta de uma experiência acadêmica abrangente que, por meio de uma abordagem de pesquisaação, foi concluída com uma amostra de 344 participantes, distribuídos em 12 grupos diferentes que faziam parte do programa de licenciatura em Engenharia Industrial em uma universidade colombiana. Para este fim, foi implementado um conjunto de práticas pedagógicas, em grande parte com base em estudos de casos apoiados por ferramentas de TIC. Este estudo inclui um resumo de cada caso desenvolvido, uma descrição da sua implementação e processo de avaliação e resultados. Os resultados indicam que, de acordo com as percepções dos alunos, há uma clara superioridade dessas iniciativas sobre as técnicas tradicionais de ensino com base em palestras convencionais, mesmo após seis meses de experiência. Contribui para promover a transferência desse conhecimento para outros contextos, a fim de promover o seu desenvolvimento e contribuir para a criação de melhores processos de ensino para futuros profissionais de engenharia e outras profissões. 

Biografía del autor/a

Orlando Enrique Contreras Pacheco, Universidad Industrial de Santander

Santander, Profesor Asociado en la Universidad Industrial de Santander. 

Aura Cecilia Pedraza Avella, Universidad Industrial de Santander

Associate Professor at Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. 

Ph.D. economic Sciences, National University of Colombia.

Master of Economics, University of Los Andes

Industrial engineer, Industrial University of Santander - UIS

Alejandra Barbosa Calderón, Universidad Industrial de Santander

Industrial Engineer, Industrial University of Santander

Citas

Abrahams, I. & Millar, R. (2008) Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, (30)(14), 1945-1969.

Angelo, T. & Boehrer, J. (2002) Case Learning: How does it work? Why is it effective?. University of California, In: www.soc.ucsb.edu/projects/casemethod/caselearning.pdf

Blank, S. (1985) Effectiveness of role playing, case studies, and simulation games in teaching agricultural economics. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, (10)(1), 55–62. In: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40987676

Brodin, G. (1978) The role of the laboratory in the education of industrial physicists and engineers. The role of the laboratory in physics education, 4-14.

CTL (1994) Teaching with Case Studies. Speaking of Teaching, (5)(2), 1-4.

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E. & Ruíz, E. T. (2015) Pedagogical Innovation: Key Driver for the Educational Process of Future Industrial Engineers--The Case of Industrial University of Santander (UIS), Colombia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, (5)(3), 220.

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E.; Barbosa, A.; Hernández, J. P. & De ECOGAS a TGI (2015) ¿Pérdida de Valor Social?. 50th Annual Assembly of the Latin American Council of Management Schools, CLADEA, Viña del Mar, Chile.

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E.; Barbosa, A. & Muñoz, J. A. (2015) Alicia Wonderland y el rediseño de su modelo de negocio. At 50th Annual Assembly of the Latin American Council of Management Schools, CLADEA, Vina del Mar, Chile.

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E.; Muñoz J. A. & Hernández, J. P. (2015) CREZCAMOS: ¿ Un paso adelante hacia el crecimiento?. TEC Empresarial, (9)(3), 39-49.

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E. & Rodríguez, L. T. (2015) A Case on a Case: Embedding Sustainable Entrepreneurship into a Managerial-Skills Course, 139. In: ECIE 2015-10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Genoa, Italy: Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.

Cropley, D. H. (2015) Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, (9)(2), 161-171.

Deniz, H.; Donnelly, L. A. & Yilmaz, I. (2008) Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (45), 420–443.

Ellet, W. (2007) The case study handbook: How to read, discuss, and write persuasively about cases. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Finney, S. & Pyke, J. (2008) Content relevance in case-study teaching: The alumni connection and its effect on student motivation. Journal of Education for Business, (83)(5), 251-258.

Harvard Business School (2016). The HBS Case Method. In: http://www.hbs.edu/mba/academic-experience/Pages/the-hbs-case-method.aspx.

Jakka, S. R. & Mantha, S. R. (2012) Case Study Method of Teaching in Management Education. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, (1)(3).

Kickul, J. & Fayolle, A. (2007) Research in Entrepreneurship Education: Introduction and Overview. In: FAYOLLE, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Koc, M. (2011) Let’s make a movie: Investigating pre-service teachers’ reflections on using video-recorded roleplaying cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, (27)(1), 95-106.

Krosnick, J. A. & Presser, S. (2010) Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of survey research, (2), 263-314.

Lewin, K. (1946) Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues (2)(4), 34-46.

Lewin, K. (1958) Group Decision and Social Change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Mertler, C. A. (2016) Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. Sage Publications.

Thousand Oaks, C. A.; Millar, R.; Le Maréchal, J. F. & Tiberghien, A. (1999) Mapping’the domain: Varieties of practical work. Practical work in science education, 33-59.

Mills, G. E. (2000) Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Muñoz, M. & Santoyo, V. H. (2013) Guía metodológica para la redacción de estudios de casos. Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. En: http://bv.ciestaam.edu.mx/attachments/article/72/Munoz%20Manrrubio--Guia%20metodologica%20para%20redaccion%20de%20estudios%20de%20caso.pdf

Oblinger, D. (2004) The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of interactive media in education, (2004)(1).

Penn, M. L.; Currie, C. S.; Hoad, K. A. & O’Brien, F. A. (2016) The use of case studies in OR teaching. Higher Education Pedagogies, (1)(1), 16-25.

Pérez, R. I. (2011) Metodología para la estructuración y desarrollo de casos.

Perry, S. J.; Hunter, E. M.; Currall, S. C. & Frauenheim, E. (2017) Developing Engineering Leaders: An Organized Innovation Approach to Engineering Education. Engineering Management Journal, (29)(2), 99-107.

Peters, C.; Cellucci, L. W. & Ford, K. (2015) Cases in the Classroom. Journal of Case Studies, (33)(1), 1-10.

Pitt, L. F. & Watson, R. T. (2011) The case for cases: writing and teaching cases for the emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, (17)(4), 319-326.

Popil, I. (2011) Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse education today, (31)(2), 204-207.

Potash, J. S. &Kalmanowitz, D. (2016) Social Action Research Methods and Art Therapy. The Wiley Handbook of Art Therapy, 626-635.

Raju, P. K. & Sankar, C. S. (1999) Teaching real-world issues through case studies. Journal of Engineering Education, (88)(4), 501.

Schwartz, M. (2015) Teaching Methods for Case Studies. Ryerson University. In: www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/lt/resources/handouts/CaseMethodBestPractices.pdf

Schwarz, N.; Knäuper, B.; Hippler, H. J.; Noelle-Neumann, E. & Clark, L. (1991) Rating scales numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. Public Opinion Quarterly, (55)(4), 570-582.

Scott, P.; Asoko, H. & Leach, J. (2007) Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science, 31–56. In: Abell, S. K. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Shamos, M. H. (1960) Science and the Humanities. Re-thining Science Education. Fifty-ninth Year Book, National Society for the Study of Education.

Sinatra, G. M.; Brem, S. K. & Evans, E. M. (2008) Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, (1), 189–195.

Thompson, E. R. (2000) Are Teaching Cases Appropriate in a Mainland Chinese Context? Evidence from Beijing MBA Students. Journal of Education for Business, (76)(2), 108-112.

Wassermann, S. (1994) Introduction to Case Method Teaching. A Guide to the Galaxy. Columbia, New York: Teachers College Press.

Wood, A. T. & Anderson, C. H. (2001) The Case Study Method: Critical Thinking Enhanced by Effective Teacher Questioning Skills.

Yadav, A. Shaver, G. M. & Meckl, P. (2010) Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, (99)(1), 55-69.

Yildiz, M. N. & Palak, D. (2016) Cultivating Global Competencies for the 21st Century Classroom: A Transformative Teaching Model. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD), (8)(1), 69-77.

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2017-06-30

Cómo citar

Contreras Pacheco, O. E., Pedraza Avella, A. C., & Barbosa Calderón, A. (2017). Teaching management in engineering schools: a practical approach. Dimensión Empresarial, 15(2), 41 - 55. https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v15i2.1059

Número

Sección

ARTÍCULOS RESULTADOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a