The entrepreneur and the exercise of power in institutional perspective


  • Carlos Hernán González-Campo
  • Guillermo Murillo
  • Fabián Fernando Osorio Tinoco



Entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, institutional environment, organized power


n order to achieve a better understanding of the potential development of the field of entrepreneurship, this paper aims to show the need to seek different perspectives to present the idea of a better way to demonstrate the relationship between the entrepreneur and the exercise of power. Our contribution from a different perspective is from the theoretical review of recent and relative area of knowledge, and that starts from understanding the nature of the entrepreneurial individual, and in this sense, make an approximation of the elements that might affect their understanding and analysis, from the developments covered by the practices of power, for which the authors propose as a relevant insight into the nature of the theoretical construction of the project framework


Bourdieu, P. (1987), Choses dites. Paris, Editions de Minuit.

Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review.

Busenitz, L., West, G. P. I., Shepherd, D. A., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship in emergence: Fourteen years of entrepreneurship research in management journals. Journal of Management: 285–308.

Clegg, S. (1980). Organization y control. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, p. 545 - 560.

Crozier, M. (1963). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago, EE.UU: University of Chicago Press.

Crozier, M. (1995). The problem of power, en Hardy, Cynthia. Power y Politics in Organizations. Dartmouth, Great Britain, 3-20.

Déry, R. & Toulouse, J.-M. (1994). La structuration sociales du champs de l’entrepreneurship: le cas du Journal Of Business Venturing (Recherche paper 94-06-02). Montreal: Maclean Hunter Chair of Entrepreneurship, HEC, the University of Montreal Business School.

DiMaggio, P.J.& Powell W.W.(1983). The iron cage revisted: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 147 – 160.

Erickson, E.H. (1959), Enfance et societé, Neuchatel. Delachaux et Niestlé.

Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, Territoireet Population: Cours au Collège de France (1977-1978). París: Seuil-Gallimard [Trad. cast. Seguridad, Territorio, Población. Curso en el Colegio de Francia (1977-1978). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2006].

Foucault, M. (2006). Seguridad, territorio y población. Buenos Aires: Fondo

Foucault, M. (2008). Nacimiento de la biopolítica. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica

Gartner, W.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management Review, 10(4), 696-706.

Gaulejac, V.D. (2005). La société malade de la gestión. Seuil, París.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in Social Theory. Berkeley, California University of California Press.

Grégoire, D., Déry, R., & Béchard, J.P. (2001). Evolving Conversations: A Look at the Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Chaper Hill: Babson College.

Hagen, E. (1962). On the theory of social change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War y Democracy in the Age of Empire, Penguin Putnam, New York.

Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance y the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, Vol. 155, p. 29 - 46.

Jordà, Ò. (1999). Ryom time aggregation in partial adjustment models. Journal of Business Economics y Statistics 17(3):382 -395.

Kilby, P. (1971). Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. P. Kilby. ed. New York: The Free Press.

Kirzner I.M. (1986). The Austrian school of economics. New Palgrave dictionary of economics. New York: Macmillan.

Kirzner, I.M. (1982). The theory of entrepreneurship in economic growth, en C.A. Kent, at al., encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Poder. Barcelona, España: Anthropos.

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London: MacMillan.

Lukes, S. (1985). El poder – Un enfoque radical. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.

March, James G. y Olsen, Johan P. (1997). El ejercicio del poder desde una perspectiva institucional. En: Revista Gestión y Política Pública, Vol. VI, No. 1, pp. 41 – 73. México: CIDE.

McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving Society Princeton: Van Nostrand.

Parsons, T. (1982) El sistema social. Versión de José Jiménez Blanco y José Cazorla Pérez. Alianza Editorial Cap. 3

Powell, W. y Dimaggio, P. (1999). El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional (esp. 1era. ed.). México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Romano, C. & Ratnatunga, J. (1996). A citation analisis of the impact of journals on contemporany small enterprise research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20 (3), 7-21.

Scott, R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations (2 ed.), London, Sage Publications.

Simon, H. (1957). Administrative Behaviour: a study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization, Nueva York, Macmillan.

Teece, D. (1996) Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation’ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 31, 193-224

Timmons, J.A.& Spinelli, S.(1999). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for 21 st century, McGraw Hill, Irwin, Boston.

Verstraete, T. (2005), Proposal for a theorical framework for research in entrepreneurship, Editions de l’ADREG

Weber, M, (1978) Economía y sociedad. Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. Edición preparada por Johannes winckelmann.

Zimmermann, A. (1998). Gestión del Cambio Organizacional. Ecuador: Abya Yala




How to Cite

González-Campo, C. H., Murillo, G., & Osorio Tinoco, F. F. (2016). The entrepreneur and the exercise of power in institutional perspective. Dimensión Empresarial, 14(2), 39-54.




Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.