Innovation in the Colombian Manufacturing Industry 2013-2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v16i1.1300Keywords:
Innovation, Subsidies, fiscal IncentivesAbstract
The aim of this document is to determine whether public instruments (subsidies and tax deductions) applied by Colombian Government during the period 2013-2014, contributed to create innovations (output additionality effect) or they just stimulated the absorption of innovations in the domestic or international market by firms in the manufacturing sector. For this purpose, the author employed a sample of 2057 companies from Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (EDIT VII) for estimating a negative binomial regression model. The fitted model evidences a positives relation between receiving tax incentives and innovating in goods and services for the international market. Likewise, receiving subsidies has a positive correlation regarding to innovate in the company. Finally, although the relation between the variables is not causal, the firms that receive subsidies, they achieve to absorb innovations in process, organizational methods related to goods and services in the domestic and international market. Furthermore, the companies that made use of tax incentives, they achieved a successfully position of their goods and services in the international market.
Resumen
En este documento se desarrolló un análisis de los instrumentos públicos (subvenciones y deducciones fiscales) aplicados por el gobierno colombiano durante los años 2013-2014, para determinar si estos contribuyeron a forjar innovaciones de producto (efecto output additionality) o únicamente estimularon la absorción de innovaciones del mercado nacional y/o internacional por parte de las firmas del sector manufacturero del país. Para este fin se tomó una muestra de 2.057 empresas de la Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (EDIT VII) y se ajustó un modelo de regresión binomial negativa. El modelo ajustado muestra una relación positiva entre recibir incentivos tributarios e innovar en bienes o servicios para el mercado internacional, de igual forma recibir subsidios tiene una correlación positiva con innovar para la empresa. Se concluye que, aunque la relación establecida no es casual, las firmas que reciben subsidios consiguen absorber innovaciones en procesos, métodos organizativos bienes o servicios del mercado nacional o internacional, además las firmas que hicieron uso de los incentivos fiscales lograron colocar en el mercado internacional, bienes y/o servicios nuevos.
Resumo
Este documento apresenta uma análise dos instrumentos públicos (subsídios e deduções fiscais) aplicadas pelo governo colombiano para os anos de 2013-2014 foi desenvolvido para determinar se essas inovações ajudaram a forma do produto (output adicionalidade efeito) ou apenas a absorção estimulada inovações do mercado nacional e / ou internacional por parte das empresas do sector produtivo. Para este efeito, uma amostra de 2.057 empresas de desenvolvimento de Pesquisa e Inovação Tecnológica (EDIT VII) foi tomada e modelo de regressão binomial negativa foi ajustado. O modelo ajustado mostra uma relação positiva entre o recebimento de incentivos fiscais e inovação em produtos ou serviços para o mercado internacional, semelhante recebem subsídios é positivamente correlacionada com a inovação para a empresa. Conclui-se que, embora a relação estabelecida não é causal, as empresas que recebem subsídios obtidos absorver inovações em processos, bens métodos organizacionais ou serviços de mercado e as empresas que fizeram uso de incentivos fiscais conseguiu colocar no mercado internacional nacional ou internacional, bens e / ou serviços.
References
Antolín, R.; Céspedes, J. & Martínez, J. (2015) Fomentando la innovación de producto en las empresas nuevas: ¿Qué instrumentos públicos son más efectivos?. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, (22)(1), 38– 46. En: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2015.05.002
Arrow, K. J. (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, 609–626. In: NBR, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. In: http://www.nber.org/books/univ62-1
Arrow, K. (1962) The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, (29)(3),155–73.
Blackman, V. (2008) The Impact of Research and Development Tax Incentives on Colombia’s Manufacturing Sector: What Difference Do They Make?, 55. In: www.imf.org
Blanes, J. V. & Busom, I. (2004) Who participates in R&D subsidy programs?: The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, (33)(10), 1459–1476. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.006
Cappelen, Å.; Raknerud, A. & Rybalka, M. (2012) The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, (41)(2), 334–345. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.001
Colciencias (2016). Tipología de Proyectos Calificados Como de Carácter Científico, Tecnológico e Innovación, (4)(1), 1–65. En: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Contraloría General de la República (2014). Resultados de la Política Pública de Beneficios Tributarios en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2010 - 2013. En: http://www.contraloria.gov.co/documents/20181/465902/14+Beneficios+Tributarios+Ciencia%2C+Tecnolog%C3%ADa+e+Innovaci%C3%B3n.pdf/3f1a570e-c667-40af-aa8a-da445d71929b?version=1.0
Czarnitzki, D.; Hanel, P. & Rosa, J. M. (2011) Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, (40)(2), 217–229. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
DANE (2015). Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica Industria Manufacturera 2013-2014, EDIT VII. En: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuesta-dedesarrollo-e-innovacion-tecnologica-edit
David, P. A.; Hall, B. H. & Toole, A. A. (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D?. A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, (29)(4-5), 497–529. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
DNP (2015). Lineamientos De Política Para Estimular La Inversión Privada En Ciencia, Tecnología E Innovación A Través De Deducciones Tributarias, 1–161. En: https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3834.pdf
Dodgson, M.; Hughes, A.; Foster, J. & Metcalfe, S. (2011) Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Research Policy, (40)(9), 1145–1156. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
Fedesarrollo (2005). Estudio Sobre La Evaluacion Del Impacto De Los Incentivos Tributarios Otorgados Para Ciencia, Tecnología E Innovacion, 1–152. En: http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co:8081/jspui/bitstream/11146/111/1/1220-Evaluacion%20impactos%20incentivos%20tributarios%20en%20CTI%20Fedesarrollo%202005.pdf
González, X. & Pazó, C. (2008) Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Research Policy, (37)(3), 371–389. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
Harris, R.; Li, Q. C. & Trainor, M. (2009) Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions?. Research Policy, (38)(1), 192–205. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.016
Herrera, L. & Heijs, J. (2007) Difusión y Adicionalidad de las Ayudas Públicas a la Innovación. Revista de Economia Aplicada, (15)(44), 177–197.
Klette, T. J.; Moen, J. & Griliches, Z. (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures?. Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, (29), 471–495. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4
Luukkonen, T. (2000) Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, (29), 711–724. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00041-4
Lambardi, G. D. & Mora, J. J. (2014) Determinantes de la innovación en productos o procesos: el caso colombiano. Revista de Economía Institucional, (16)(31), 251-262.
Malaver, F. & Vargas, M. (2013) Formas de innovar y sus implicaciones de Política : Lecciones de una experiencia. Cuadernos de Economía, (32)(60), 499–532.
Martin, S. & Scott, J. T. (2000) The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, (29)(4-5), 437–447. In: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0
OCDE (2014). Estudios de la OCDE de las Politicas de Innovación: Colombia. Resumen ejecutivo, 1–45. En: https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/colombia-innovation-review-assessment-and-recommendations-spanish.pdf
OCyT. (2016) Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología Colombia 2015. En: http://www.colciencias.gov.co/sala_prensa/ocytpresenta-indicadores-de-ciencia-y-tecnologia-para-colombia-2015
OCDE & EUROSTAT (2005). Manual de Oslo guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. En http://www.itq.edu.mx/convocatorias/manualdeoslo.pdf
Parra, M. (2011) Exenciones fiscales para la I+D+i Experiencias en América Latina y retos pendientes. BID. En: https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/5690
Perdomo, G. & Arias, J. E. (2013) Las políticas públicas de desarrollo empresarial e innovación desde la perspectiva de la nueva gestión pública y la gobernanza : caso CREAME. Apuntes Del CENES, (32)(56), 139–204. En: http://virtual.uptc.edu.co/revistas2013f/index.php/cenes/article/viewFile/2447/2328
Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, (98)(5), S71–S102. In: http://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Sarmiento, A. Z. (2015) Ciencia y tecnología en el plan nacional de desarrollo 2014-2018: Todos por un nuevo país. Documento Escuela de Economía, 64.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Evanston, Illinois: Martino Pub.
Urraca, Ana (2000). Patrones Sectoriales de Cambio Técnico en la Industria Española. Economía Industrial (332), 99– 108.
Vaona, A. & Pianta, M. (2008) Firm size and innovation in European manufacturing. Small Business Economics, (30)(3), 283–299. En: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9043-9
Vega-Jurado, Jaider M.; Fernández de Lucio, Ignacio; Gutiérrez-Gracia, Antonio & Manjarrés-Henriquez, Liney A. (2005) Los Determinantes de la Innovación Tecnológica en la Empresa : Una Aproximación a través del Concepto de Capacidad de Absorción. En: http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/10432/1/AC76_1_3.pdf
Vives, Jaume (2002). El diagnóstico de la sobredispersión en modelos de análisis de datos de recuento. Tesis. En: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=4642
Wooldridge, J. M. (2006) Introducción a la econometría: un enfoque moderno. México: Editorial
Paraninfo. Yang, C. H.; Huang, C. H. & Hou, T. C. T. (2012) Tax incentives and R&D activity: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, (41)(9), 1578–1588. En: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Instructions for filling in the Certification of Originality and the Copyright Transfer:
Keep in mind that by pressing the "save and continue" button at the end, you are assuming all the ethical and legal commitments set forth herein. They establish the responsibilities of the legislation on intellectual property rights. For this it is assumed that whoever is carrying out the action of presenting the written work in good faith and represents himself and the other authors of the postulated article.
In this sense, the authors retain all the rights of which they are owners and authorize the free reproduction of the document sent. In the event of being necessary, they will assume, by pressing the "save and continue" button, the legal responsibility derived from the patrimonial rights which are free because of the non-payment by any procedure of the Journal.
Consequently, the author (s) represented by the person who advances the postulation of the article for evaluation and eventual publication,
I (We) declare:
1. I am (we are) the author (s) of the article {here is the name of the article placed automatically}.
2. This is an original work in accordance with the intellectual property law of Colombian copyright.
3. The content of the article of the reference has not been published and that it will not be submitted to any other means of publication in written or electronic support before knowing the decision of the Editorial Committee of Dimensión Empresarial.
4. The signer of this certification guarantees that the commitment acquired here does not infringe any third-party rights.
5. The publication authorization includes its electronic file and its adaptation, if necessary, for its incorporation in the network or in any electronic format or database, as well as attaching the necessary metadata to register the work, trademarks of water or any other security or protection system.
6. The publication authorization includes reproduction on digital media. As well as its distribution and making available through institutional archives through the Internet, distribute copies, and exhibit it in Colombia and outside the country, as well as include the article in national and international indexes.
7. The author assumes all responsibility, including compensation for damages, that could be exercised against the Universidad Autónoma del Caribe by third parties who violated their rights and interests because of the assignment.
For its part, Dimension Empresarial undertakes to respect in any case the rights of the author contained in Article 30 of Law 23 of 1982, or any after it and will make the article available to the users of the Journal so that make a legitimate use of it, as permitted by the applicable legislation, provided that its authorship is cited, commercial benefit is not obtained, and derivative works are not made.
The authors agree to accept the conditions of this intellectual property note, which will be applied to this submission when it is published in this journal.
