Impacto de la capacidad de absorción y ambidiestralidad en la innovación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v19i1.2616Keywords:
Absorptive capacity, ambidexterity, technological innovation, manufacturingAbstract
Este estudio intenta diseñar un enfoque que muestre cómo la capacidad de absorción y la ambidiestralidad se relacionan con la innovación tecnológica en las empresas manufactureras peruanas. Se propone un modelo de ecuación estructural. La muestra está compuesta por 783 empresas manufactureras. Se encontró que, aunque las empresas manufactureras peruanas invierten poco en investigación y desarrollo, son capaces de desarrollar capacidades dinámicas, como capacidad de absorción y ambidiestralidad, para llevar a cabo mejor la innovación tecnológica.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Ciravegna, L., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2017). Multilatinas and the internationalization of Latin American firms. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 447-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.006
Aljanabi, A. R. A., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2015). The mediating role of market orientation on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity and technological innovation capabilities. Asian Social Science, 11(5), 219-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n5p219
Aryasa, K. B., Wahyuni, S., Sudhartio, L., & Wyanto, S. H. (2017). The impact of absorptive capacity, organizational inertia on alliance ambidexterity and innovation for sustained performance. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 1-19.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd. ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
Cabeza-Pullés, D., Fernández-Pérez, V., & Roldán-Bravo, M. I. (2020). Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research. European Management Journal, 38(3), 450-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.008
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
Chang, Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes, Management Decision, 49(10), 1658-1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183816
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Del Carpio-Gallegos, J. F., & Miralles-Torner, F. (2018). Absorptive capacity and innovation in low-tech companies in emerging economies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 13(2), 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242018000200003
Derbyshire, J. (2014). The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors. Technovation, 34(10), 574-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.010
Diaz-Molina, I. (2018). The role of strategic and operational absorptive capacity in organizational ambidexterity [Conference session]. 2018 Engaged Management Scholarship Conference, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3235526
Dutta, S. K. (2013). Market orientation ambidexterity. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 10(1), 54.
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022
Fernandez, V. (2017). The finance of innovation in Latin America. International Review of Financial Analysis, 53, 37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.08.008
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Gregson, G. (2020). Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America. Academy of Management Global Proceedings, 301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219896096
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of production economics, 133(2), 662-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hair Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review. 2(6), 106-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Ince, H., Imamoglu, S. Z., & Turkcan, H. (2016). The effect of technological innovation capabilities and absorptive capacity on firm innovativeness: A conceptual framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 764-770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.078
Koçoglu, I., Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2015). The differential relationship between absorptive capacity and product innovativeness: A theoretically derived framework. International Business Research, 8(7), 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n7p108
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
Liao, S., Liu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2018). Technology innovation ambidexterity, business model ambidexterity, and firm performance in Chinese high-tech firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 26(3), 325-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2018.1549954
Limaj, E., Bernroider, E. W., & Choudrie, J. (2016). The impact of social information system governance, utilization, and capabilities on absorptive capacity and innovation: A case of Austrian SMEs. Information & Management, 53(3), 380-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.12.003
Lin, H. E., McDonough III, E. F., Lin, S. J., & Lin, C. Y. Y. (2013). Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 262-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
Lucena, A., & Roper, S. (2016). Absorptive capacity and ambidexterity in R&D: Linking technology alliance diversity and firm innovation. European Management Review, 13(3), 159-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12074
Mardi, M., Arief, M., Furinto, A., & Kumaradjaja, R. (2018). Sustaining organizational performance through organizational ambidexterity by adapting social technology. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(3), 1049-1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0385-5
Martinez-Senra, A. I., Quintas, M. A., Sartal, A., & Vázquez, X. H. (2015). How can firms’ basic research turn into product innovation? The role of absorptive capacity and industry appropriability. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(2), 205-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2014.2386614
Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
Olavarrieta, S., & Villena, M. G. (2014). Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 489-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.005
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.978493
Pelagio Rodriguez, R., Hechanova, M., & Regina, M. (2014). A study of culture dimensions, organizational ambidexterity, and perceived innovation in teams. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 21-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242014000300002
Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: Substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 35-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1314246
Revilla, E., Prieto, I. M., & Rodríguez, B. (2011). Information technology and the ambidexterity hypotheses: An analysis in product development. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), 4(2), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1002973
Schoenmakers, W., & Duysters, G. (2006). Learning in strategic technology alliances. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(2), 245–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600624162
Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001
Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001
Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high‐tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832-847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126
Wong, C. W., Wong, C. Y., & Boon-itt, S. (2013). The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 566-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.004
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. doi: 10.1086/651257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Zou, T., Ertug, G., & George, G. (2018). The capacity to innovate: A meta-analysis of absorptive capacity. Innovation, 20(2), 87-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1428105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Javier Fernando Del Carpio Gallegos, Francesc Miralles, Eduardo Javier Soria Gomez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Instructions for filling in the Certification of Originality and the Copyright Transfer:
Keep in mind that by pressing the "save and continue" button at the end, you are assuming all the ethical and legal commitments set forth herein. They establish the responsibilities of the legislation on intellectual property rights. For this it is assumed that whoever is carrying out the action of presenting the written work in good faith and represents himself and the other authors of the postulated article.
In this sense, the authors retain all the rights of which they are owners and authorize the free reproduction of the document sent. In the event of being necessary, they will assume, by pressing the "save and continue" button, the legal responsibility derived from the patrimonial rights which are free because of the non-payment by any procedure of the Journal.
Consequently, the author (s) represented by the person who advances the postulation of the article for evaluation and eventual publication,
I (We) declare:
1. I am (we are) the author (s) of the article {here is the name of the article placed automatically}.
2. This is an original work in accordance with the intellectual property law of Colombian copyright.
3. The content of the article of the reference has not been published and that it will not be submitted to any other means of publication in written or electronic support before knowing the decision of the Editorial Committee of Dimensión Empresarial.
4. The signer of this certification guarantees that the commitment acquired here does not infringe any third-party rights.
5. The publication authorization includes its electronic file and its adaptation, if necessary, for its incorporation in the network or in any electronic format or database, as well as attaching the necessary metadata to register the work, trademarks of water or any other security or protection system.
6. The publication authorization includes reproduction on digital media. As well as its distribution and making available through institutional archives through the Internet, distribute copies, and exhibit it in Colombia and outside the country, as well as include the article in national and international indexes.
7. The author assumes all responsibility, including compensation for damages, that could be exercised against the Universidad Autónoma del Caribe by third parties who violated their rights and interests because of the assignment.
For its part, Dimension Empresarial undertakes to respect in any case the rights of the author contained in Article 30 of Law 23 of 1982, or any after it and will make the article available to the users of the Journal so that make a legitimate use of it, as permitted by the applicable legislation, provided that its authorship is cited, commercial benefit is not obtained, and derivative works are not made.
The authors agree to accept the conditions of this intellectual property note, which will be applied to this submission when it is published in this journal.
