China and Latin America, from neo-colonialism to interdependence? Brazil Case // China y América Latina, ¿desde el neocolonialismo hasta la interdependencia? Caso de Brasil // China e América Latina, da neo-colonialismo à interdependência? Caso Brasil

Angela Piedad Suarez Torres


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15665/dem.v16i1.1385

Abstract


Since the eighties, the relationship that China has developed with Latinomerica has been strengthened, becoming the third most important partner in the region. This regulation is not only the opening of a new market for China but varied opportunities for Latin-American countries. However, starting from the topic of natural resources and analyzing the case of Brazil, the article seeks to present how this relationship that in principle is framed in Neocolonialism, with interests merely of extraction and use of the resources of the region, can be considered a change towards a more equitable relationship framed in interdependence, from which the two parties can benefit.

Desde los años ochenta, la relación que China ha desarrollado con Latinomerica se ha ido fortaleciendo, llegando a convertirse en el tercer socio mas importante de la region. Esta reglación no solo es la apertura de un nuevo mercado para China sino variadas oportunidades para los paises latinomaericnos. Sin embargo, partiendo del tema de los recursos natural y analizando el caso de Brasil, el artículo busca presentar cómo esta relación que en principo se enmarca en el Neocolonialismo, con intereses meramente de extracción  y aprovechamiento de los recursos de la region, se puede considerar un cambio hacia una relación más equitativa enmarcada en la interdependencia, de la cual las dos partes pueden ser beneficiadas.

Desde os anos 80, o relacionamento que a China desenvolveu com a Latinomerica foi fortalecido, tornando-se o terceiro parceiro mais importante da região. Este regulamento não é apenas a abertura de um novo mercado para a China, mas oportunidades variadas para os países latino-americanos. No entanto, partindo do tema dos recursos naturais e analisando o caso do Brasil, o artigo procura apresentar como essa relação que em princípio se enquadra no Neocolonialismo, com interesses meramente de extração e uso dos recursos da região, pode ser considerada uma mudança em direção a um relacionamento mais equitativo emoldurado na interdependência, do qual as duas partes podem se beneficiar.


Keywords


Development, region, China, Latin America, interdependence, Neocolonialism // Desarrollo, región, China, Latinoamérica, interdependencia, Neocolonialismo

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cheng, Joseph Y.S. (2006). “Latin America in China’s contemporary foreign policy”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36:4, 500-528.

Devlin, Robert, Estevadeordal, Antoni and Rodriguez-Clare, Andrés (2006). The Emergence of China: Oportunities and Challenges for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.

Dominguez, Jorge I. (2006). “China’s Relations with Latin America: Shared Gains, Asymmetric Hopes”. Working paper for Inter-American Dialogue.

ECLAC, United Nations. (2011). “People’s Republic of China and Latin America and the Caribbean: Ushering in a new era in the economic and trade relationship” ( http://www.eclac.org/comercio/publicaciones/xml/4/43664/People_Republic_of_China_and_Latina_America_and_the_Caribbean_trade.pdf, 15 May 2013).

Ferchen, Matt (2011). “China – Latin America relations: Long-term Boon or Short-term Boom?. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4, 55-86.

Fernández Jilberto, Alex E. and Hogenboom, Barbara (2010). Latin America facing China: South – South relations beyond the Washington Consensus. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Financial Times (26 April 2011). “China is now region’s biggest partner”. Special Report, The New Trade Routes: Latin America.

He, Li (2007). “China’s growing interest in Latin America and its implications”. Journal of Strategic Studies, 30:4, 833-862.

He, Li (30 October 2008). “China’s growing influence in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities”. EIA Background Brief No. 411 (http://www.eai.nus.edu.sg/BB411.pdf, 3 May 2013).

Interamerican Development Bank (2010). “Ten Years After the Take-off: Taking Stock of China – Latin America and the Caribbean Economic Relations”. (http://www.iadb.org/en/publications/publication-detail,7101.html?id=7809, 10 May 2013).

International Institute for Environment and Development (9 May 2013). “Report scopes sustainability of China- Latin America relations”. (http://www.iied.org/report-scopes-sustainability-china-latin-america-relations, 15 May 2013).

Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph S. (1989). Power and Interdependence. Harlow, England: Longman.

Lanteigne, Marc (2009). Chinese Foreign Policy, An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Li, Jiabao and Zhang, Jianming (18 October 2012). “Deeper Sino-Latin American trade cooperation urged”. China Daily.

Mansor de Matos, Jorge Augusto and Dias Carcanholo, Marcelo (2012). “Amenazas y oportunidades del Comercio Brasileño con China lecciones para Brasil”. Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, 168:43.117-145.

Ministerio das Relacoes Exteriores do Brasil. “China”. (http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/temas/temas-politicos-e-relacoes-bilaterais/asia-e-oceania/china/pdf, 10 May 2013).

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. “China’s Policy Paper on Latin-America and the Caribbean” (http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/zxxx/t521025.htm, 3 May 2013).

Sutter, Robert G. (2008). Chinese Foreign Relations, Power and Policy since the cold war. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

The Economist (13 August 2009). “The dragon in the Backyard”. Latin American Geopolitics (http://www.economist.com/node/14209932, 15 May 2013).

Watts, Jonathan (26 March 2013). “China’s exploitation of Latin American natural resources raises concern”. The Guardian.

Young, Robert J.C. (2001). Postcolonialism: A Historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Angela Piedad Suarez Torres

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Our index:

Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals (WoS recognition): Citation Index (ESCI)=+3.5, DOAJ (EBSCO, EconLit, vLex, DOAJ)=5, SCIB (Secondary Composite Index Broadcasting)=9.5. Likewise, in the PUBLINDEX we were recognized as being a journal of the first quartile (Q1) for its level of reading and citation.

License by: