INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC ACIDS ON THE REACTIVATION OF NiMo/Al₂O₃ CATALYSTS FOR THE HYDRODESULFURIZATION OF DIBENZOTHIOPHENE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15665/wca0wy43

Abstract

This study evaluated the reactivation of NiMo/Al₂O₃ catalysts for the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of dibenzothiophene (DBT) using EDTA and glutamic acid as chelating treatments. The catalyst treated with glutamic acid exhibited the highest specific surface area (159 m²/g) and pore volume (0.298 cm³/g), favoring reactant transport. The EDTA-treated catalyst showed lower values (97 m²/g and 0.229 cm³/g), but with higher microporosity (18 m²/g), enhancing internal accessibility. The regenerated catalyst had a surface area of 251 m²/g and pore volume of 0.249 cm³/g. HRTEM analysis revealed better MoS₂ dispersion in the chelated samples: average stacking numbers were N = 2.30 (EDTA) and N = 2.63 (glutamic acid), compared to N = 3.36 for the regenerated catalyst. Dispersion (D) was also higher for EDTA (0.41) than for the regenerated sample (0.27). In catalytic activity, NiMo/Al₂O₃-(EDTA) achieved the highest DBT conversion (83%) and selectivity towards the direct desulfurization (DDS) route (81.3%), followed by the glutamic acid-treated catalyst (29%, 79.9%) and the regenerated one (41%, 63.7%). The spent catalyst only reached 27% conversion and 58.3% DDS selectivity. These results demonstrate that chelating treatments enhance textural and structural properties, promoting better MoS₂ edge exposure and improving DDS and hydrogenation (HYD) pathways, thus boosting overall HDS performance.

References

I. Babich, «Science and technology of novel processes for deep desulfurization of oil refinery streams: a review⋆», Fuel, vol. 82, n.o 6, pp. 607-631, abr. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00324-1.

A. Pimerzin, A. Roganov, A. Mozhaev, K. Maslakov, P. Nikulshin, y A. Pimerzin, «Active phase transformation in industrial CoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst during its deactivation and rejuvenation with organic chemicals treatment», Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 173, pp. 56-65, may 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.01.008.

C. Bartholomew y M. Argyle, «Advances in Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration», Catalysts, vol. 5, n.o 2, pp. 949-954, jun. 2015, doi: 10.3390/catal5020949.

J. G. Téllez Romero, P. Sarabia-Bañuelos, S. Hernández-González, y V. A. Nolasco-Arizmendi, «Mecanismos de desactivación de catalizadores heterogéneos», MN, vol. 14, n.o 26, pp. 1e-16e, oct. 2020, doi: 10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2021.26.69642.

P. Dufresne, «Hydroprocessing catalysts regeneration and recycling», Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 322, pp. 67-75, abr. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.013.

N.-Q. Bui, C. Geantet, y G. Berhault, «Maleic acid, an efficient additive for the activation of regenerated CoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalysts», Journal of Catalysis, vol. 330, pp. 374-386, oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.031.

C. E. Santolalla-Vargas et al., «Effect of trimesic acid as chelating agent in sulfided CoMoP/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for hydrodesulfurization of straight-run gas oil», Catalysis Today, vol. 349, pp. 244-255, jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.010.

J. A. Toledo-Antonio, M. A. Cortes-Jacome, J. Escobar-Aguilar, C. Angeles-Chavez, J. Navarrete-Bolaños, y E. López-Salinas, «Upgrading HDS activity of MoS2 catalysts by chelating thioglycolic acid to MoOx supported on alumina», Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 213, pp. 106-117, sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.011.

MINISTERIO DE MINAS Y ENERGÍA y MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE, RESOLUCIÓN 40103 DE 2021. 2021, p. 26. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://gestornormativo.creg.gov.co/gestor/entorno/docs/resolucion_minminas_40433_2021.htm

C. Song, «An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel», Catalysis Today, vol. 86, n.o 1-4, pp. 211-263, nov. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00412-7.

«Resolución 40103 de 2021.»

E. Puello-Polo et al., «Dibenzothiophene Hydrodesulfurization Performance Over Hierarchically Porous NiMoS(Si,Zr)/Al2 O3 Catalysts», Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 63, n.o 19, pp. 8553-8565, may 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03242.

E. Puello-Polo, P. Betancourt, y F. J. Méndez, «Enhanced hydrotreating performance of hierarchical NiMo-S/Al2O3 catalysts through ZrO2 incorporation and template-driven structural modulation», Catalysis Today, vol. 443, p. 114973, ene. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2024.114973.

H. Al-Sheeha, M. Marafi, V. Raghavan, y M. S. Rana, «Recycling and Recovery Routes for Spent Hydroprocessing Catalyst Waste», Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 52, n.o 36, pp. 12794-12801, sep. 2013, doi: 10.1021/ie4019148.

S. Badoga, K. C. Mouli, K. K. Soni, A. K. Dalai, y J. Adjaye, «Beneficial influence of EDTA on the structure and catalytic properties of sulfided NiMo/SBA-15 catalysts for hydrotreating of light gas oil», Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 125, pp. 67-84, ago. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.015.

D. Hu et al., «The effect of chelating agent on hydrodesulfurization reaction of ordered mesoporous alumina supported NiMo catalysts», Petroleum Science, vol. 19, n.o 1, pp. 321-328, feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.11.005.

M. Ayala-G, E. Puello P, P. Quintana, G. González-García, y C. Diaz, «Comparison between alumina supported catalytic precursors and their application in thiophene hydrodesulfurization: (NH 4 ) 4 [NiMo 6 O 24 H 6 ]·5H 2 O/γ-Al 2 O 3 and NiMoOx/γ-Al 2 O 3 conventional systems», RSC Adv., vol. 5, n.o 124, pp. 102652-102662, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C5RA17695F.

M. Thommes et al., «Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)», Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 87, n.o 9-10, pp. 1051-1069, oct. 2015, doi: 10.1515/pac-2014-1117.

S. Kasztelan, H. Toulhoat, J. Grimblot, y J. P. Bonnelle, «A geometrical model of the active phase of hydrotreating catalysts», Applied Catalysis, vol. 13, n.o 1, pp. 127-159, dic. 1984, doi: 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)83333-3.

M. Li, H. Li, F. Jiang, Y. Chu, y H. Nie, «The relation between morphology of (Co)MoS2 phases and selective hydrodesulfurization for CoMo catalysts», Catalysis Today, vol. 149, n.o 1-2, pp. 35-39, ene. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.03.017.

International Centre for Diffraction Data, «International Center for Diffraction Data® (ICDD®), Power Diffraction File, ICDD, Newtown Square, Philadelphia.»

E. J. M. Hensen et al., «The Relation between Morphology and Hydrotreating Activity for Supported MoS2 Particles», Journal of Catalysis, vol. 199, n.o 2, pp. 224-235, abr. 2001, doi: 10.1006/jcat.2000.3158.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC ACIDS ON THE REACTIVATION OF NiMo/Al₂O₃ CATALYSTS FOR THE HYDRODESULFURIZATION OF DIBENZOTHIOPHENE. (2026). Journal Prospectiva, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.15665/wca0wy43